Legal Opinion

In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 10, 2009No. 1 CA-MH 08-0017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

205 P.3d 1124 (2009)

In re MH XXXX-XXXXXX.

No. 1 CA-MH 08-0017.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

February 10, 2009.

Andrew P. Thomas, Maricopa County Attorney by Anne C. Longo, Geraldine L. Roll, Deputy County Attorneys, Civil Division, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.

James J. Haas, Maricopa County Public Defender by Edith M. Lucero, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant challenges his involuntary treatment order. Specifically, he argues that he was not personally examined by two doctors as required by Arizona Revised…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. In re MH 2006-000749Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Mh2009-002120Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API