Legal Opinion
In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 6, 2010No. 2 CA-MH 2010-0001Published
1Opinion of the Court
240 P.3d 1262 (2010)
In re PINAL COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH-201000029.
No. 2 CA-MH 2010-0001.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.
October 6, 2010.
James P. Walsh, Pinal County Attorney By Craig Cameron, Florence, Attorneys for Appellee.
Mary Wisdom, Pinal County Public Defender By Lisa M. Surhio, Florence, Attorneys for Appellant.
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Judge.
¶ 1 After a hearing on a petition for court-ordered treatment, the trial court found by clear and convincing evidence that appellant is persistently and acutely disabled as a result of a mental disorder and is either unable or…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.