Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Wynn
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided April 22, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Yan Sant, Commissioner
—Affirming.
A demurrer having been sustained to the petition, appellant declined to plead further whereupon judgment was entered dismissing his petition. The petition is in words and figures as follows, towit:
“The plaintiff, Moody Boyd, says that the defendant, Dr. Joseph J. Wynn, is a qualified and licensed oculist, of Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky, and as such is subject to the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Health.
“That some time prior to October 15,1938, the Sight of plaintiff’s left eye became defective, and on about that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Crockett's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Ketcham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Farmers' Bank of White Plains v. BassCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Siler v. Proctor Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gracey v. EakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Caldwell v. ChauvinKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Morris v. Consolidation Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Arnett v. BaskousAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Catherine Panko, Admx. Of the Estate of Margaret R. Barrett, Dec'd v. Consolidated Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.