Legal Opinion

Siler v. Proctor Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 8, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

The appellant, Laura Siler, has sued the appellees, Proctor Coal Company, Hugh Finley, and Charles Finley, for slander.

The petition alleges that about ten days before the trial in the Whitley circuit court of a case in which the Thomas heirs were plaintiffs and the appellees were defendants, the defendants, through Hugh Finley, president of the company, caused certain named persons to appear and falsely and maliciously testify that the general moral character and reputation of the plaintiff, Laura Siler, was bad. It is further charged that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adams v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Sebree v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Paducah Newspapers, Inc. v. BratcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Neace v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Roberts v. SturgillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Miller v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Boyd v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  5. Abell v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API