Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Baskous

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1993No. S-5277PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

Marcus Arnett appeals the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Dr. Alexander Baskous. Arnett’s principal claim is that Dr. Baskous breached his duty to keep Arnett’s medical records confidential by releasing the records to the District Attorney for use in Arnett’s criminal trial. We conclude that Arnett’s claim has no merit and affirm the judgment.

II. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS

While serving a fifteen year sentence for sexually abusing his minor daughter, Ar-nett brought this civil suit seeking damages from Baskous, his physician, for releasing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fairbanks Publishing Company v. FranciscoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Drake v. HosleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ferguson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ward v. Lutheran Hospitals & Homes Society of America, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Karen L. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Krossa v. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API