Caldwell v. Chauvin
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
CHIEF JUSTICE MINTON
Litigants have historically been permitted to conduct ex parte1 interviews with *143fact -witnesses. These interviews serve various purposes but are mainly directed at investigating the facts of the case and curtailing litigation costs by allowing litigants to gauge. the -usefulness of- a witness’s potential testimony by interviewing the witness before paying for a discovery deposition.
Whether this time-honored method of informal discovery extends to the plaintiffs treating physicians and what role the federal Health Insurance Portability and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. TrudeKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. KleinfeldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Carole Kuligoski, Individually and On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, and Mark Kuligoski and James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat and Northeast Kingdom Human ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Harrold-Jones v. DruryAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Carole Kuligoski, Individually and On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, Mark Kuligoski and James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat and Northeast Kingdom Human ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Haage v. ZavalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.