Hamilton v. Carpenter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From an order denying defendants' motion to set aside a sale of real property pursuant to a decree foreclosing a deed of trust, defendants appeal.
The essential facts are:
Defendants executed a deed of trust to secure a promissory note payable to plaintiff. This deed of trust was foreclosed as a mortgage pursuant to the requirements of section 725a of the Code of Civil Procedure. (See Hamilton v. Carpenter, 15 Cal. (2d) 130 [98 P. (2d) 1027].) Thereafter on December 3, 1940, the property described in the deed of trust consisting of two separate parcels of real estate was sold en masse to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Smith v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Connick v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Browne v. FerreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carpenter v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Turner v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Young v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Young v. HesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.