Legal Opinion

Young v. Barker

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1948No. Civ. 16063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

As the facts in this ease unfold there will appear a program, well prepared and almost successful, whereby plaintiff hoped to acquire a valuable property for a paltry sum by following the forms of law but in defiance of the elemental rules of equity and without a simulacrum of justice.

Plaintiff purchased a number of accounts receivable from a bankrupt estate, among them an account against defendant amounting to $72. On September 11, 1941, plaintiff filed an action on the account in the Municipal Court of Long Beach. An affidavit was filed by Boy C. Kaiser, plaintiff’s attorney, stating that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Winbigler v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Turner v. MilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Smith v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Majer v. FosseenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Jordan v. Hopkins (In re Jordan)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API