Legal Opinion

Young v. Hessler

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1945No. Civ. 14947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, J. pro tem.

This is an action for partition of real property. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying her any relief and enjoining her from asserting any claim to said property.

Plaintiff purchased an account against Fred Hessler and brought an action thereon against him in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles. A default judgment was entered on July 12, 1941. On that same day plaintiff caused to be recorded in the office of the county recorder of Los Angeles County an abstract of said judgment certified by the clerk of said court, thereby creating a judgment lien on his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Green v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pepin v. StricklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tenhet v. BoswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Squibb v. SquibbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Jordan v. Hopkins (In re Jordan)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API