Legal Opinion

Employers Casualty Co. v. Moore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1943No. Civil No. 4512PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

George A. and Edith Damron, on June 4, 1941, employed Moore & Romley, a local firm of lawyers, to bring an action against Thomas E. Hudson, a resident of California, on account of personal injuries sustained by them by reason of the negligent operation of an automobile by said Hudson. The contract of employment was in writing and under it the Damrons agreed to pay said attorneys for their services “an amount equal to thirty three and one-third per cent (33%%) of all sums recovered, whether by suit or compromise.” In the contract was this stipulation :

“This retainer shall operate as an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Chicago Street Railroad v. AckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Coughlin v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Herbits v. Constitution Indemnity Co. of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. United Verde Extension Mining Co. v. RalstonArizona Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Marks v. StrubleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  2. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Schroeder v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & SalmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API