Legal Opinion

Deatsch v. Fairfield

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925No. Civil No. 2191PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— The plaintiffs as depositors, and as assignees of thirty-eight other depositors, of the Exchange Bank of Peoria, a domestic banking corporation, brought this action against Charles W. Fairfield, as bank comptroller, and Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, as surety, alleging that the sums sued for ($16,429.88) were deposited from time to time after March 22, 1921, and before February 22, 1922, by plaintiffs and their assignors; that during said times the bank was insolvent and unsafe and known to be so by defendant comptroller, or by the exercise of reasonable care and diligence on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wandry v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Valley Bank v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Mills v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Thompson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. First National Bank of Sheridan v. Citizens' State Bank of DubuqueWyoming Supreme Court · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Mosher v. ConwayArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Connor Livestock Co. v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Julian v. CarpenterArizona Supreme Court · 1947

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API