Lunderberg v. City of St. Peter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of remand following an assessment to property owners for sewer service line improvement constructed by the City of St. Peter, Minnesota. The trial court ordered reassessment based on a per foot calculation rather than a per service charge. Appellants claim the trial court erred in ordering reassessment because the reassessment is not formulated on market value increase and exceeds special benefits received. We reverse and reinstate the city’s original assessment.
FACTS
Pursuant to a 1971 stipulation agreement with the Minnesota…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Anderson v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MaloneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Bisbee v. City of FairmontCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Dosedel v. City of Ham LakeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987