Legal Opinion

Bisbee v. City of Fairmont

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1999No. C3-98-2151PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant City of Fairmont challenges the summary judgment granted by the district court in favor of respondent landowners in a consolidated special assessment appeal. Appellant argues: (1) the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear respondents’ joint appeal; and (2) appellant’s assessment method was valid and created a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the assessments exceeded the special benefits. Respondents seek damages on appeal under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 138. Because we conclude respondents were properly joined and appellant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bateman v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. American Bank of St. Paul v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Cederberg v. City of Inver Grove HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Independent School District No. 775 v. Holm Bros. Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API