Legal Opinion
Anderson v. City of Bemidji
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1980No. 48740PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Plaintiff, Ralph Anderson, appealed to the district court from a special sanitary sewer assessment imposed on his property by defendant, City of Bemidji. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court struck down the assessment on the ground that it was not uniform as to Anderson’s property as required by Minn.Const. art. 10, § 1, and ordered the city to recompute the assessment. The city appeals from the order. We reverse.
During 1975 and 1976, the city constructed a sanitary sewer running through the Pine Ridge Addition and generally northwesterly along Highway No. 2, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Bank of St. Paul v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Bisbee v. City of FairmontCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Buzick v. City of BlaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Countryside Village v. City of North BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.