Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1956No. Civ. 21405PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting respondents a new trial upon the issues of damages only.

Virgil Murphy and his two minor children, Sheril Le and Janice Kae, brought an action against Corwin B. Wilson for personal injuries and property damage arising out of an automobile accident. The plaintiffs claimed general damages as follows: Sheril Le, $7,500; Janice Kae, $5,000; Virgil, $55,000. Virgil Murphy claimed special damages substantially as follows: $50 for repair of his car; $90 for loss of use of his car; $10 for medical services for the children; $392 for medical services; $1,000 for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Berg v. SonenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Haynes v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API