Inmin v. State

Keith Thomas Inmin, the appellant, was convicted of theft of property in the first degree, was sentenced to five years' imprisonment, was fined $500, and was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $70,000.

After his conviction, the appellant obtained new counsel, who filed a motion for a new trial, alleging that trial counsel had been ineffective. Following a hearing, the circuit court denied the motion. On this direct appeal of his conviction, the appellant raises five issues relating to the ineffectiveness of trial counsel.

A

First, the appellant claims that his trial counsel was…