Legal Opinion

Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1932No. Civil No. 2872PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Appellees have filed their petition for a rehearing of this appeal. They accept as correctly stating the law the two fundamental principies laid down by us in our opinion, ante, p. 65, 4 Pac. (2d) 369, to wit, that percolating waters are not subject to appropriation under the law of Arizona, and that when an appropriation is made from subterranean waters they must be shown to be of the same character as appropriable surface waters by clear and convincing testimony. They contend, however, that we have in effect affirmed their right of appropriation to a portion of the waters which were the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Jarvis v. State Land Department, City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water In the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Grady v. BarthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API