Legal Opinion

Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. Hassell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 6, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 89-134PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Presiding Judge.

In 1985, Arizona officials upset longstanding assumptions about title to riverbed lands by asserting that the state owned all lands in the beds of Arizona watercourses that were navigable when Arizona was admitted to the Union. The 38th Arizona Legislature responded by enacting 1987 Ariz.Sess.Laws, ch. 127 (H.B. 2017) (codified at Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 37-1101 to 37-1108, 12-510, and 12-529 (Supp. 1990)), substantially relinquishing the state’s interest in such lands. The validity of that statute is the subject of this appeal.

BACKGROUND

A. The Equal Footing…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Yslava v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1993
  5. In Re the Contested Case Hearing on Water Use, Well Construction, & Pump Installation Permit Applications, Filed by Wai'ola O Moloka'i, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API