Legal Opinion

Denby v. Dorman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 155, Calendar No. 36,836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On November 2, 1926, Hyman D. Dorman and Eose A. Dorman, his wife, the defendants herein, entered into a contract to sell certain lots in the city of Detroit to Sam Ozeran and Eose Ozeran, his wife, for the sum of $40,000, of which $5,000 was then paid and the balance to be paid in monthly payments of $275 for the first three years and $300 per month thereafter, the entire sum to be paid within eight years.

On December 17,1928, tbe defendants entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff! herein which, after reciting the execution of the foregoing contract and that there was then unpaid…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buck v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kies v. WalworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Mier v. HaddenMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Maynard v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Eicholtz v. GrunewaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. King v. LuyckxMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. McClellan v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Strandt v. StrandtMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API