Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 38,344PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint in which a decree was sought determining them to be the sole owners of the property of Charles L. Cale, deceased, and that the executor be ordered to specifically perform an oral contract between themselves and the deceased. It is claimed the deceased agreed to give them all of the property of which he might die possessed, if they would leave their home in Illinois, come to Allegan, Michigan, and go upon his farm, cultivate the same, make a home for him and pay his funeral and last illness expenses, including markers on his grave…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wild v. WildMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Denby v. DormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bryll v. MisteckiMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. PoppenMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Snider v. SchafferMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. King v. LuyckxMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Strandt v. StrandtMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Walters v. DurbinMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API