Legal Opinion

Eicholtz v. Grunewald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1946No. Docket No. 34, Calendar No. 43,244PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiffs are six of the surviving children of John H. Eicholtz and Katherine Eicholtz, husband and wife, both deceased. Defendants (cross-appellants) Rose Grünewald and Harold Eicholtz are the other two surviving children of said decedents. The other defendants were joined for purposes not important to the main issues involved. The bill of complaint was filed to compel specific performance of a claimed oral agreement which plaintiffs assert was entered into by John H. Eicholtz and Katherine Eicholtz during lifetime to make mutual reciprocal identical wills, binding on the survivor, and to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Loree v. VedderMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Passmore v. Estate of PassmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Keasey v. EnglesMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Lau v. LauMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. YieldingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Lindsay v. LipsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Paley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Rogers v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hammel v. FoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API