Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Marquette. Specific performance. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

Maynard filed his bill of complaint to enforce payment of a mere money demand under a writ-' ten agreement relating to lands, void under the statute of frauds because not signed by the party by whom the sale was to be made. Comp. L., § 4694; Abell v. Munson, 18 Mich., 312; Cook v. Bell, id., 393.

*299There are many reasons against and none in favor of granting the relief sought. The contract was void, and a reference to the circumstances which gave rise to it shows it to be destitute of all equities. The contract even if valid was so drawn that it was optional with the complainant to retain the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Chambers v. LivermoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bigler v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Garbarino v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. Munro v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Gillette v. Metzgar Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API