Legal Opinion

Valente v. Sica

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1934No. Civ. 5139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

The question here presented has to do with the sufficiency of a creditor’s claim against the estate of a decedent. The trial court, upon conflicting evidence, has found that the claim was duly presented to the administrator of the estate of Gerardo Sica, deceased, which finding is binding upon us.

The first point urged by appellant is that the claim is insufficient in that the affidavit thereto is defective. The claim sets forth in sufficient detail items of the account, and attached to the claim is the following affidavit, duly verified:

“State of California,
“County of Napa,—ss.
“Wallace…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Guerian v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. OAK GROVE UNION SCH. DIST. OF SONOMA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Von Breton v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Altschul v. SchweitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Kuakini Hospital & Home v. YamanohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API