Legal Opinion

Von Breton v. Hicks

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1942No. Civ. No. 13615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, P. J.

Plaintiff sued in equity to establish the validity of a creditor’s claim and to compel the creation of a. fund for the payment of such claim. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal, The sole ground upon which defendants seek a reversal is their contention, in effect, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding that “on the 25th day of March, 1941, and within . . . [the] six months’ period, as prescribed by the . . . notice to creditors as published, said plaintiff caused to be presented to the . . . co-executors at the place designated in . . . [the]…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De La Motte v. RuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Dell v. HjorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Macart v. San Joaquin Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Roddan v. DoaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Signorelli v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API