Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kuakini Hospital & Home v. Yamanoha

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1961No. 4121Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OP

MIZUHA, J.

When the coexecutrix Margaret E. Yamanoha opened the envelopes and read the statements from the Kuakini Hospital and Home in November and December, 1957, and January, 1958, she was presented a legally sufficient claim by the hospital against the estate of her deceased husband. If more particulars were desired, the coexecutrix could demand same at any time after the receipt of the first statement. It is incumbent upon the coexecutrix to call for any needed clarification when enough has been done to constitute a claim. Standiford v. Cantrell, 87 Cal. App. 736, 262…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Sprague v. VogtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Elmer L. Caylor v. C. Edgar VirdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  4. United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Syler v. KatzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API