Legal Opinion

Holt v. Eastern Motor Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1941No. 29013PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An automobile dealer who furnishes to another an automobile to be driven by the latter for demonstration purposes is liable to a third person, whom the dealer knew would be in the vicinity of its use, for damages resulting from a latent defect therein which the dealer could have discovered by the exercise of ordinary care, where such defect is of such nature as to make the automobile, for the purpose furnished, a dangerous instrumentality as to such third person, if the third person could not have discovered the defect by the exercise of ordinary care and could not have avoided the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. NuGrape Bottling Co. v. KnottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Collette v. PageSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1921
  3. Parker v. Loving & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Harris v. Whitehall Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. McDaniel v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Brown v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Hines v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Roebuck v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Kaplan v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API