Harris v. Whitehall Chevrolet Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Per curiam
The ultimate question for determination is whether or not the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer of Whitehall Chevrolet Company to the petition as amended. Omitting some of its formal allegations, and some of the allegations deemed unnecessary in deciding the question at issue, the petition'brought by Mrs. J. J. Harris against Miss Frances Menge and Whitehall Chevrolet Company substantially alleges: “3. That . . defendants have injured and damaged petitioner in the sum of $25,000 by reason of the following facts: 4. That . . Whitehall Chevrolet Company, during all of the time or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hamp v. Universal Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Dickason v. DickasonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Simril v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Burks v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Cruse v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Holt v. Eastern Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Holt v. Eastern Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.