Legal Opinion

Roebuck v. Payne

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1964No. 40441PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. “Where an infant is a party defendant in a civil action it is ordinarily necessary to the validity of the judgment that the court appoint a guardian ad litem to protect his interests. An estoppel in pais to urge the defense, however, may arise where, as here, the fact of infancy is unknown to the court or the opposing parties, no facts are shown which would reasonably cause them to question the defendant’s age, and the defendant, with knowledge of his rights and of the ignorance of the court and the parties to the case, appears, pleads, and actively participates in the trial…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Davis v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Brown v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Jones v. CloudCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. C. K. Security Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Thomason v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API