Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1938No. 27058PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. The mere fact that an automobile dealer delivers an automobile to a prospective purchaser for the purposes of trial and demonstration does not create the relationship of master and servant. Harris v. Whitehall Chevrolet Co., 55 Ga. App. 130 (189 S. E. 392).

2. An automobile dealer who delivers an automobile to a prospeetive purchaser in a defective condition is not bound to anticipate that the prospective purchaser will be negligent in connection with and after discovering the defect, unless there are circumstances alleged, known to the dealer, which would put him on notice that such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Piedmont Hospital v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Harris v. Whitehall Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Burks v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Holt v. Eastern Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Holt v. Eastern Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Young v. KogerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API