Legal Opinion

Alford v. Shaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1987No. 132PA85PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether a special litigation committee’s decision to terminate plaintiff minority shareholders’ derivative action against defendant corporate directors is binding upon the courts. In our earlier opinion in this case, 318 N.C. 289, 349 S.E. 2d 41 (1986), we stated that the “business *467judgment rule,” a doctrine shielding the good faith actions of disinterested corporate directors from judicial inquiry on the merits, required deference to the decisions of independent special litigation committees. Consequently we held that summary judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Clary v. Alexander County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  2. Houle v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. In Re PSE & G Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Lewis Ex Rel. Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API