Deible v. Poole
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRARD, Judge.
Kathleen Deible (“Deible”) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to correct error, claiming the trial court abused its discretion when it did not order a new trial.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
While stopped at a stop light on January 7, 1989, Deible was struck from behind by a ear driven by Steven Poole (“Poole”). At the time of the accident, Poole was not wearing his glasses as required by his driver’s license and was not looking at the road. The rear passenger side fender on Deible’s car was damaged in the collision and Deible began to feel pain…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colonial Discount Corp. v. BerkhardtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Wiese-GMC, Inc. v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- DeVittorio v. Werker Bros., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Schuh v. SilcoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by23 opinions
- Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Kocher v. GetzIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Childress v. BucklerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kristoff v. GlassonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dado v. JeeningaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.