Legal Opinion

Willis v. Westerfield

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2006No. 49S02-0512-CV-692PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that the common law sudden emergency doctrine is not an affirmative defense within the meaning of Indiana Trial Rule 8(C) that requires affirmative defenses to be pleaded in a defendant's answer. We also hold that in cases where the defendant seeks a failure to mitigate damages instruction based on a plaintiff's failure to follow a treating doctor's recommendations, whether expert medical opinion testimony is required is to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Factual and Procedural Background

On May 8, 1996, Christopher Wester-field rear-ended Ann Willis' van as it was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Piskorowski v. Shell Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Johnson v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Baker v. WagersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Myers v. LevyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC v. KephartIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Gayle Fischer v. Michael and Noel HeymannIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Wanda Denson v. The Estate of Delmer Dillard and Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Estate of Dyer v. DoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API