Legal Opinion

Schuh v. Silcox

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1991No. 24A04-9105-CV-134PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Irene Schuh appeals the trial court's denial of her motion for a new trial after she received a negative judgment in her per*927sonal injury action against Richard Silcox. Irene raises four issues for our review, which we rephrase as:

I. Whether the trial court erroneously denied Irene's motion for a new trial.

II. Whether the trial court erroneously refused evidence submitted by Irene as to the injuries sustained by Irene's mother in the same collision.

III. Whether the trial court submitted an erroneous verdict form to the jury.

IV. Whether the jury was properly instructed.

We reverse.

O…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mid-States Aircraft Engines, Inc. v. Mize Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Hockett v. BreunigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kirchoff v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Deible v. PooleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Barnard v. HimesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Precision Screen MacHines, Inc. v. HixsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Dawson v. HummerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API