Kristoff v. Glasson
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
George Kristoff (“Kristoff’) appeals the trial court’s evidentiary rulings excluding certain evidence and Maya Glasson (“Glas-son”) cross-appeals, after a jury verdict for Glasson on her complaint against Kristoff.
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions.
ISSUES
Kristojfs Issues
1. Whether the trial court erroneously denied Kristoff s request for discovery of the audio portion of the video recording of the accident site.
2. Whether the trial court erroneously granted Glasson’s motion to strike portions of Dr. Aruna Rau’s (“Dr.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sears Roebuck and Co. v. ManuilovIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- McGee v. BonaventuraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Deible v. PooleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Walker v. CuppettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wilkinson v. SwaffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Young v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.