Legal Opinion

In Re Atwater

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 12, 2009No. 26733PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary action, we suspend Michael E. Atwater (Respondent) from the practice of law for six months and order him to pay the costs of these disciplinary proceedings due to Respondent’s repeated failure to respond to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) in the investigation of five matters.

I. FACTS

Respondent was licensed to practice law in 1995. ODC investigated five complaints involving Respondent that were filed from 2004 to 2006. A hearing was held on September 13, 2007, at which Respondent appeared pro se. A Hearing Panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct found…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. In Re HazzardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. In Re TullisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. In Re BraghirolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. In re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. In the Matter of Michael D. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API