State v. Mauldin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
The question to be answered in the present appeal is whether the bondsman who had executed separate appearance bonds for two defendants charged in the trial court with the commission of the felony of burglary in the second degree, which had been forfeited, was entitled to a notice of hearing on his motions to set aside forfeitures of the bonds and an opportunity to present evidence of good cause for failure of defendants to appear for trial. We determine he was.
Thirteen months after bondsman executed the bonds involved, defendants’ cases were regularly set for jury trial, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grattan v. TillmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Lebus v. CardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Short v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. YorkCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Maryland National Insurance Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Black v. Ball Janitorial Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Johnson v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Capitol Federal Savings Bank v. BewleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- State v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.