Legal Opinion

Capitol Federal Savings Bank v. Bewley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 4, 1990No. 69801PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice.

Appellant, Norman N. Bewley (“Bew-ley”), and others entered into a loan transaction with Capitol Federal Savings Bank (“Capitol Federal”) in which a promissory note and real estate mortgage was executed. Appellee, Northwest Federal Savings and Loan Association (“Northwest”), is the successor by merger to Arrowhead Federal Savings and Loan Association, which was the successor in interest to Capitol Federal. The promissory note was subsequently defaulted and Capitol Federal initiated an action on the note and foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage naming Bew-ley as a defendant.

A…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. McDaneld v. Lynn Hickey Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Norman v. Trison Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Ouellette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API