Legal Opinion

State v. York

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1975No. 47403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.

The state appeals from an order setting aside a judgment of forfeiture on three bonds claiming it to be illegal for three reasons: (1) The motion to set it aside was not timely filed; (2) There has been a prior forfeiture of the bonds; and (3) There was a failure to show good cause for accused’s absence.

Melton Gene York was charged in three cases with the crime of forgery in the second degree on June 29, 1973. On the following day an appearance bond was executed in each case in the amount of $5,000 with Bill Davidson as surety. These cases were consolidated and set for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lorentz v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. State v. MauldinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. State v. NesbittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. State v. EbenhackCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API