Legal Opinion

Lippman v. Ross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1924No. 18161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

This action was instituted by appellant against the defendant H. Ross. A writ of garnishment was issued against one Barney Simon as garnishee defendant. Respondent intervened, claiming the property held by the garnishee defendant, whereupon the garnishee defendant admitted that he *320had certain merchandise in his possession and filed an answer in disclaimer. Appellant denying the ownership of the respondent, the issue was tried, resulting in a judgment in favor of respondent, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

The Marine National Bank, by merger, is successor in interest of the Northwest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hickok v. . CowperthwaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Churchill v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rice & Bullen Malting Co. v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Qualley v. Snoqualmie Valley BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. First State Bank v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Goembel v. HeeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API