Lippman v. Ross
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.
This action was instituted by appellant against the defendant H. Ross. A writ of garnishment was issued against one Barney Simon as garnishee defendant. Respondent intervened, claiming the property held by the garnishee defendant, whereupon the garnishee defendant admitted that he *320had certain merchandise in his possession and filed an answer in disclaimer. Appellant denying the ownership of the respondent, the issue was tried, resulting in a judgment in favor of respondent, from which judgment this appeal is taken.
The Marine National Bank, by merger, is successor in interest of the Northwest…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hickok v. . CowperthwaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Churchill v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Rice & Bullen Malting Co. v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Qualley v. Snoqualmie Valley BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- First State Bank v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Goembel v. HeeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942