Legal Opinion

First State Bank v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1941No. 28774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This action was instituted in the trial court by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendant in error, as defendant. Said cause was tried without the intervention of a jury and resulted in judgment wherein a claim asserted by the defendant was upheld as a set-off against the plaintiff’s claim, and the only recovery decreed was in favor of the defendant for its costs. The plaintiff has perfected this appeal, asserting that said judgment is erroneous.

The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, except where the plaintiff is designated merely as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Schumann v. Bank of California, N. A.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In Re Assessment of Sales Tax Against KnappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Ashcraft v. ButtsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. City Nat. Bank v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ogilvie v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Koch Fuels, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Ogilvie v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API