Legal Opinion

Qualley v. Snoqualmie Valley Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1925No. 19225. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— The mind of a Gaboriau might grasp the turbinated whirl of incidents in this case, hut one not similarly endowed experiences some difib culty in unraveling the confused skeins. As near as it is possible to state the facts, they are: In October, 1918, A. Q. with his then wife E. Q. sold land in Benton county to P., taking P.’s note arid mortgage on the land for $4,800, dated October 1, 1918, and payable in five years, with semi-annual interest. In August, 1919, A. Q. purchased land in King county from P. 1ST. and M. N. In that transaction A. Q. and H. Q., his then wife, gave to P. N. their…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Harding v. EldridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Security Warehousing Co. v. HandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
  4. Textor v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  5. Bank of California v. DanamillerWashington Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Dolly Madison Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. In Re CopelandDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  3. Hodge v. TruaxWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Whiting v. RubinsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kietz v. Gold Point Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API