Legal Opinion

Goembel v. Heesch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1942No. 33,117Published

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

After a directed verdict for defendant, plaintiff moved for judgment non obstante or a new trial. From the order denying the motion, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff sued for the conversion of a Buick sedan. The complaint alleged that defendant, the sheriff of Pipestone county, on August 7, 1940, wrongfully levied upon and took the Buick under process directed against AÍ Frick, doing business as the Motor Inn Garage, to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $1,110. It also alleged that on August 17, 1940, plaintiff served on defendant an affidavit of his title and right to possession of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Live Stock State Bank v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. Ainsworth v. KrugerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Rice & Bullen Malting Co. v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sneeden v. . Nurnberger's MarketSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Clark v. CorserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API