Stewart v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The Special Term has dismissed the original complaint and an amended complaint; but upon the dismissal of the amended complaint leavé was given to plaintiff to move to examine the defendant “ to ascertain facts from which to frame his complaint ’\
The motion thus permitted was brought on and granted in due course; the order from which defendant appeals authorizes not only an examination of the defendant through an officer having knowledge of the facts, but permits full inspection of books and papers ‘ ‘ pertaining to transactions between the parties hereto ”. The form of the order, therefore,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Keviczky v. LorberNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Kenerson v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Beikirch v. LoebsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Houlihan-ParnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Gleich v. KissingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Barrett v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
- L-Tron Corp. v. Davco Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.