Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 2003PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOYCE, J.:

¶ 1 Michael Wilson, Appellant, appeals from the May 23, 2001 order denying his first petition for relief filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa. C.S.A. §§ 9541 — 9546. We hold that Appellant’s PCRA petition is untimely because Appellant failed to file his petition within one year of the date his judgment of sentence became final. We further hold that Appellant failed to plead and prove the applicability of one of the limited exceptions to the jurisdictional timeliness requirements of the PCRA. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the PCRA court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. Gamboa-TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. RojasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. WhitehawkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. ChazinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API