Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chazin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 2005PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, through the District Attorney of Philadelphia County, appeals the trial court’s order granting a new trial to Barry Chazin pursuant to provisions of the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46. The court concluded that Chazin’s lawyer provided ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) in having failed to offer the defendant appropriate advice concerning the Commonwealth’s offer to recommend a sentence below the mandatory minimum in exchange for his guilty plea to a charge of Robbery. The Commonwealth counters that the court erred in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. KimballSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FowlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Com. v. Steckley, S., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. ParsonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Boston v. MooneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. FowlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API