Legal Opinion

Cairns v. Dole

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 2004No. 00CV2686CC; A118751PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her legal malpractice claims against defendants Don Dole and Kim Ronai after the court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations, ORS 12.110(1). We reverse and remand in part.

On August 22, 2000, plaintiff filed a complaint against Dole and Ronai, an associate in Dole’s firm, alleging that defendants were negligent in the handling of several matters for her from March 1996 through March 1998. Defendants sought to dismiss the claims on the ground that they are barred by the two-year statute of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Jaquith v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Padrick v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Kelly v. LessnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Catt v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Bixby v. KBR, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  5. National Surety Corporation v. TIG Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API