Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Lessner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 19, 2008No. 060809121; A135003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing her amended complaint for failure to commence her action against defendant within the statute of limitations. ORCP 21 A(9). Our review of an order granting an ORCP 21 A(9) motion to dismiss is limited to the face of the pleadings. In conducting that review, we assume the truth of all allegations in the complaint and give the plaintiff, as the non-moving party, the benefit of all favorable inferences that could be drawn from those allegations. Dauven v. St. Vincent Hospital, 130 Or App 584, 586, 883 P2d 241 (1994). We reverse.

Plaintiff initiated this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McLean v. Charles Ellis Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Cairns v. DoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Dauven v. St. Vincent Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Padrick v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Hernandez-Zurita v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Kastle v. Salem HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Zsarko v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API