Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Mutual Life Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1941No. 6800PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

July 15, 1927, appellant purchased from respondent a life insurance policy, additionally providing for benefit payments for total and permanent disability as follows:

“Section 3
“Total Disability. — Disability shall be considered total when there is any impairment of mind or body which continuously renders it impossible for the Insured to follow a gainful occupation.
“Permanent Disability. — Total disability shall, during its continuance, be presumed to be permanent;(a) If such disability is result of conditions which render it reasonably certain that such disability will continue during the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Young v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  3. Kroetch v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Young v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. SnoderlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fairchild v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rollefson v. Lutheran BrotherhoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Werth v. TrombergIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API