Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Mutual Life Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1941No. 6800PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
July 15, 1927, appellant purchased from respondent a life insurance policy, additionally providing for benefit payments for total and permanent disability as follows:
“Section 3
“Total Disability. — Disability shall be considered total when there is any impairment of mind or body which continuously renders it impossible for the Insured to follow a gainful occupation.
“Permanent Disability. — Total disability shall, during its continuance, be presumed to be permanent;(a) If such disability is result of conditions which render it reasonably certain that such disability will continue during the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Young v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Kroetch v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Young v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. SnoderlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Fairchild v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Rollefson v. Lutheran BrotherhoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Werth v. TrombergIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.