Legal Opinion

Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto Shop

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1937No. 6438PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

This is an appeal by Gray’s Auto Shop, employer, an Idaho corporation, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, surety of such employer, from a judgment of the district court reversing a decision of the Industrial Accident Board denying respondent compensation for an injury claimed to have been sustained by an accident on the evening of October 22-, 1935, while claimant was working on a fender of an automobile in the shop of his employer.

Following the accident and on October 28, 1935, respondent filed with the Industrial Accident Board a report of the accident and a claim for compensation in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Arundel v. TurkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Sprouse v. MagesIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Manion Ex Rel. Manion v. WaybrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dunn v. BaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lebak v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API