Legal Opinion

Rindlisbaker v. Wilson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1974No. 11127PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Respondent F. Clair Rindlisbaker brought this action for damages against the manufacturer and distributor of a fertilizer applicator and against the fertilizer dealer who furnished the applicator to respondent for use in respondent’s field.

In 1967 respondent’s father, with whom respondent was a partner in a family farming partnership, called Wilson’s Farm Service (hereinafter Wilson) and placed an order for anhydrous ammonia fertilizer. Wilson filled the order by sending an employee to the Rindlisbaker farm with a Farmore fertilizer applicator filled with anhydrous ammonia. The…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. General Electric Company v. BushNevada Supreme Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Sanchez v. GaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API